- Open Access
Noncoding RNA localisation mechanisms in chromatin regulation
Silence volume 3, Article number: 2 (2012)
An important challenge in biology has been to understand how cell-type-specific expression programs are orchestrated through regulated access to chromatin. Knowledge of the interaction between noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) and chromatin regulators has the potential to help answer such questions, but how ncRNAs target chromatin regulators to specific sites in the genome is not well understood. Recently, Jeon and Lee proposed that DNA-binding proteins act as a bridge between ncRNAs and their target sites in chromatin. In this minireview, we examine their findings and place them in the wider context of how chromatin regulator-RNA complexes are targeted to specific sites in chromatin.
A number of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been demonstrated to play a role in transcriptional or chromatin regulation through their interaction with chromatin-modifying enzymes and transcription factors. Some of these RNAs can be visualised to be associated with specific loci, most strikingly the coating of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) by X inactive-specific transcript (Xist) RNA. Modulation of a number of ncRNAs leads to changes in the targeting of regulatory complexes to specific genomic sites. Mechanisms must therefore be in operation that direct ncRNA-protein complexes to specific sites in the genome.
Role of the DNA-binding protein YY1 in the localisation of Xist RNA
Dosage compensation in female mammals is achieved by silencing one copy of the two X chromosomes, termed 'X-chromosome inactivation' (XCI). The long ncRNA Xist is the key factor in initiating this process . Xist is transcribed from the X-inactivation centre (Xic) of the future Xi and progressively coats the chromosome. This is accompanied by the appearance of repressive chromatin modifications, including those catalysed by polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2). Xist RNA has been proposed to play a direct role in the recruitment of PRC2 through protein-RNA interaction . An unresolved question has been how the Xist-PRC2 complex becomes exclusively localised to the future Xi. Jeon and Lee addressed this problem by studying Xist expression from an inducible transgene in post-XCI embryonic fibroblasts and using in situ hybridization and RT-PCR to distinguish between endogenous and transgenic Xist expression . Transgenic Xist RNA localised to the transgene, but, surprisingly, endogenous Xist RNA, normally localised only to Xi, was also seen to migrate to the transgene locus. Seeking to identify a DNA element necessary for this accumulation of Xist RNA, the authors identified a cluster of three Yin Yang 1 (YY1) binding sites within the Xist transgene, and, consistent with this, found that knockdown of YY1 expression also abrogated Xist localisation. Reasoning that YY1 might act as a bridge between the Xic and Xist RNA, Jeon and Lee found that Xist and YY1 interact in cells and that YY1 interacts with the Xist repeat C region in vitro. Consistent with this finding, an earlier study conducted at the Lee laboratory showed that targeting the C region with locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotides caused displacement of Xist from the Xi . On the basis of these data, the authors proposed that YY1 acts to anchor the Xist-PRC2 complex to the Xic by simultaneously binding to Xist DNA and RNA  (Figure 1A).
A number of further experiments could be performed to test the model of Jeon and Lee . Is the Xist C repeat region needed for accumulation of Xist at the Xic? Does Xist bind YY1 and PRC2 simultaneously, and are the YY1 DNA-binding sites and the RNA repeat C region needed for PRC2 recruitment to the Xic? Can YY1 bind to DNA and RNA simultaneously, and which parts of the protein are required? How does Xist proceed to coat the Xi after initial association with the Xic? The authors showed that YY1 specifically binds to Xist exon1 on the Xi and not on the Xa, which raises the question of what causes this specificity in YY1 binding . It is possible that YY1 does not bind to the nucleation centre on Xa because of the presence of a heterochromatic structure induced by the Xist antisense ncRNA Tsix . YY1 binding sites are also common in the genome, so what prevents Xist accumulation at these positions? Perhaps other factors are involved, such as the RNA-binding nuclear scaffold protein hnRNPU/SP120/SAF-A, which is also required for Xist accumulation on the Xi . Alternatively, in the absence of artificial transgenes, Xist RNA may be captured only by YY1 bound in cis.
Do DNA-binding proteins target other noncoding RNAs to specific sites in chromatin?
The mechanism identified by Jeon and Lee  may be responsible for the targeting of other ncRNAs to specific sites in chromatin. The long intergenic RNA Hox antisense intergenic RNA (HOTAIR) is expressed from the HOXC locus and modulates histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27) methylation at HOXD and several other sites in the genome in trans [7, 8]. HOTAIR interacts with PRC2 and the H3K4me2 demethylase complex lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), thereby bridging two activities which function to promote maintenance of the repressed state . Authors of two recent papers introduced methods termed 'chromatin isolation by RNA purification' (ChIRP)  and 'capture hybridization analysis of RNA targets' (CHART) , respectively, that use biotinylated oligonucleotides to enrich for DNA sequences associated with a particular RNA. ChIRP was used to isolate HOTAIR-associated chromatin and to identify the enriched DNA sequences by next-generation sequencing . The authors found that HOTAIR commonly nucleates at GA-rich DNA, raising the possibility that the specific targeting of PRC2 and LSD1 by HOTAIR might occur through a YY1-like factor binding to a GA-rich motif.
Noncoding RNA targeting through chromosomal looping
Another potential mechanism involved in the targeting of ncRNAs to distant DNA target sites is the proximity between loci induced by chromosomal looping (Figure 1B). The long ncRNA HOXA transcript at the distal tip (HOTTIP) is transcribed from the 5' end of the HOXA locus and interacts with mixed-lineage leukaemia (MLL) H3K4 methyltransferase complexes through WD repeat-containing protein 5 (WDR5) . Chromosomal conformation capture shows that chromosomal looping brings HOTTIP into contact with downstream parts of HOXA, and it has been proposed that this allows HOTTIP RNA to target WDR5-MLL to downstream genes . Chromosomal looping may also be important for localisation of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) to protein-coding genes [12–14]. Knockdown of eRNAs often leads to repression of neighbouring protein-coding genes, suggesting that they play a role in enhancer function . One could imagine that interaction between chromosomal loops may also act to bring ncRNA loci into contact with more distant sites in trans, including those on different chromosomes.
Noncoding RNA targeting by triplex formation with DNA
Direct interactions between RNA and DNA sequences also provide a potential mechanism by which ncRNAs target chromatin regulators to specific sites (Figure 1C). Short promoter RNAs (pRNAs) transcribed from between ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes directly interact with the nucleolar remodeling complex (NoRC), and this interaction is necessary for association of NoRC with the promoters of rRNA genes in the nucleolus . As for Xist, the regions of the RNA required for NoRC binding and RNA targeting appear to be distinct. A stem-loop structure within the middle of the RNA is necessary for interaction with NoRC , but a short sequence towards the 5' end is required for recruitment of the RNA to nucleoli [16, 17]. This region corresponds to the DNA element T0, and in vitro gel shift and protection assays suggest that it forms a triplex structure with the T0 DNA sequence. In addition to allowing the RNA to associate with rRNA promoters, this triplex structure is recognised by DNMT3B and is required for DNA methylation . Whether triplex formation occurs between ncRNAs and genomic DNA in cells is unclear, but if it does, it could play a general role in targeting ncRNAs to specific sites.
Targeting regulatory proteins to sites of noncoding RNA transcription
RNA can target transcriptional regulator proteins in cis as it is being transcribed (Figure 1D). The 60-nucleotide transactivation response (TAR) RNA is produced after RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) initiation at the HIV long-terminal repeat . In the absence of the HIV protein Tat, further elongation by RNA Pol II is inefficient because of the action of the negative regulatory factors DRB sensitivity-inducing factor (DSIF) and negative elongation factor (NELF) . Tat binds to TAR during transcription and recruits positive transcriptional elongation factor b, or P-TEFb, which then phosphorylates RNA Pol II, DSIF and NELF, resulting in mRNA production [19–22]. A similar mechanism may also function in the targeting of repressive complexes to sites of transcription. Short ncRNAs are transcribed from CpG islands at the 5' end of human genes [23, 24]. The RNAs are produced from sites distinct from the gene promoter, and their expression is anticorrelated with gene activity . Production of these short RNAs in the absence of mRNA transcription is associated with targeting of PRC2 in cis, and the RNAs directly interact with PRC2 in vitro and in cells .
Summary and outlook
Growing evidence suggests that ncRNAs play an important role in chromatin and transcriptional regulation. How these ncRNAs are localised to specific sites in chromatin is not yet clear, but common themes may be emerging. Jeon and Lee's study  outlines a mechanism whereby ncRNAs localise to specific loci through interaction with DNA-binding proteins. A role for transcription factors in targeting chromatin regulator-RNA complexes is consistent with their role in initiating changes in epigenetic modifications. It is possible that multiple targeting mechanisms function together. For example, chromosomal looping may provide a high local concentration of ncRNA near a distant target site, with DNA-binding factors then functioning to tether the ncRNA and the associated regulatory complex to more specific locations. Employing genomic methods such as ChIRP or CHART to measure changes in RNA localisation that accompany experimental perturbations will further help to define the mechanisms involved. Recent results indicating that some presumed ncRNAs are associated with ribosomes  highlight the importance of determining which RNAs associate with chromatin and which do not. Future work will lead to the derivation of a more robust set of general principles that govern ncRNA localisation and their role in transcriptional and chromatin regulation.
reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
Senner CE, Brockdorff N: Xist gene regulation at the onset of X inactivation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009, 19: 122-126. 10.1016/j.gde.2009.03.003.
Zhao J, Sun BK, Erwin JA, Song JJ, Lee JT: Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science. 2008, 322: 750-756. 10.1126/science.1163045.
Jeon Y, Lee JT: YY1 tethers Xist RNA to the inactive X nucleation center. Cell. 2011, 146: 119-133. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.026.
Sarma K, Levasseur P, Aristarkhov A, Lee JT: Locked nucleic acids (LNAs) reveal sequence requirements and kinetics of Xist RNA localization to the X chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 22196-22201. 10.1073/pnas.1009785107.
Navarro P, Page DR, Avner P, Rougeulle C: Tsix-mediated epigenetic switch of a CTCF-flanked region of the Xist promoter determines the Xist transcription program. Genes Dev. 2006, 20: 2787-2792. 10.1101/gad.389006.
Hasegawa Y, Brockdorff N, Kawano S, Tsutui K, Nakagawa S: The matrix protein hnRNP U is required for chromosomal localization of Xist RNA. Dev Cell. 2010, 19: 469-476. 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.08.006.
Rinn JL, Kertesz M, Wang JK, Squazzo SL, Xu X, Brugmann SA, Goodnough LH, Helms JA, Farnham PJ, Segal E, Chang HY: Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2007, 129: 1311-1323. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.022.
Tsai MC, Manor O, Wan Y, Mosammaparast N, Wang JK, Lan F, Shi Y, Segal E, Chang HY: Long noncoding RNA as modular scaffold of histone modification complexes. Science. 2010, 329: 689-693. 10.1126/science.1192002.
Chu C, Qu K, Zhong FL, Artandi SE, Chang HY: Genomic maps of long noncoding RNA occupancy reveal principles of RNA-chromatin interactions. Mol Cell. 2011, 44: 667-678. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.027.
Simon MD, Wang CI, Kharchenko PV, West JA, Chapman BA, Alekseyenko AA, Borowsky ML, Kuroda MI, Kingston RE: The genomic binding sites of a noncoding RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011, 108: 20497-20502. 10.1073/pnas.1113536108.
Wang KC, Yang YW, Liu B, Sanyal A, Corces-Zimmerman R, Chen Y, Lajoie BR, Protacio A, Flynn RA, Gupta RA, Wysocka J, Lei M, Dekker J, Helms JA, Chang HY: A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature. 2011, 472: 120-124. 10.1038/nature09819.
Wang D, Garcia-Bassets I, Benner C, Li W, Su X, Zhou Y, Qiu J, Liu W, Kaikkonen MU, Ohgi KA, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG, Fu XD: Reprogramming transcription by distinct classes of enhancers functionally defined by eRNA. Nature. 2011, 474: 390-394. 10.1038/nature10006.
Ørom UA, Derrien T, Beringer M, Gumireddy K, Gardini A, Bussotti G, Lai F, Zytnicki M, Notredame C, Huang Q, Guigo R, Shiekhattar R: Long noncoding RNAs with enhancer-like function in human cells. Cell. 2010, 143: 46-58. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001.
Kim TK, Hemberg M, Gray JM, Costa AM, Bear DM, Wu J, Harmin DA, Laptewicz M, Barbara-Haley K, Kuersten S, Markenscoff-Papadimitriou E, Kuhl D, Bito H, Worley PF, Kreiman G, Greenberg ME: Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers. Nature. 2010, 465: 182-187. 10.1038/nature09033.
Mayer C, Schmitz KM, Li J, Grummt I, Santoro R: Intergenic transcripts regulate the epigenetic state of rRNA genes. Mol Cell. 2006, 22: 351-361. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.03.028.
Mayer C, Neubert M, Grummt I: The structure of NoRC-associated RNA is crucial for targeting the chromatin remodelling complex NoRC to the nucleolus. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9: 774-780. 10.1038/embor.2008.109.
Schmitz KM, Mayer C, Postepska A, Grummt I: Interaction of noncoding RNA with the rDNA promoter mediates recruitment of DNMT3b and silencing of rRNA genes. Genes Dev. 2010, 24: 2264-2269. 10.1101/gad.590910.
Kao SY, Calman AF, Luciw PA, Peterlin BM: Anti-termination of transcription within the long terminal repeat of HIV-1 by tat gene product. Nature. 1987, 330: 489-493. 10.1038/330489a0.
Ping YH, Rana TM: DSIF and NELF interact with RNA polymerase II elongation complex and HIV-1 Tat stimulates P-TEFb-mediated phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II and DSIF during transcription elongation. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 12951-12958. 10.1074/jbc.M006130200.
Mancebo HS, Lee G, Flygare J, Tomassini J, Luu P, Zhu Y, Peng J, Blau C, Hazuda D, Price D, Flores O: P-TEFb kinase is required for HIV Tat transcriptional activation in vivo and in vitro. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 2633-2644. 10.1101/gad.11.20.2633.
Zhu Y, Pe'ery T, Peng J, Ramanathan Y, Marshall N, Marshall T, Amendt B, Mathews MB, Price DH: Transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is required for HIV-1 tat transactivation in vitro. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 2622-2632. 10.1101/gad.11.20.2622.
Wei P, Garber ME, Fang SM, Fischer WH, Jones KA: A novel CDK9-associated C-type cyclin interacts directly with HIV-1 Tat and mediates its high-affinity, loop-specific binding to TAR RNA. Cell. 1998, 92: 451-462. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80939-3.
Kapranov P, Cheng J, Dike S, Nix DA, Duttagupta R, Willingham AT, Stadler PF, Hertel J, Hackermüller J, Hofacker IL, Bell I, Cheung E, Drenkow J, Dumais E, Patel S, Helt G, Ganesh M, Ghosh S, Piccolboni A, Sementchenko V, Tammana H, Gingeras TR: RNA maps reveal new RNA classes and a possible function for pervasive transcription. Science. 2007, 316: 1484-1488. 10.1126/science.1138341.
Kanhere A, Viiri K, Araújo CC, Rasaiyaah J, Bouwman RD, Whyte WA, Pereira CF, Brookes E, Walker K, Bell GW, Pombo A, Fisher AG, Young RA, Jenner RG: Short RNAs are transcribed from repressed polycomb target genes and interact with polycomb repressive complex-2. Mol Cell. 2010, 38: 675-688. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.019.
Ingolia NT, Lareau LF, Weissman JS: Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell. 2011, 147: 789-802. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.002.
This work was funded by an MRC Career Development Award to RGJ. AK was funded by the MRC Centre for Medical Molecular Virology.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
AK and RGJ wrote this review together, and both read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.